Introduction
A.Without lighting any scene of a movie or in our life would be pitch black all the more important that lighting brings believability to our life. The visual effects of light in The Amazing Spiderman 2 and Paranorman are very different however it creates a understandable belivibility.
B. Thesis: Though methods of creating visual effects of lighting are different, both movies aim to deliver a believable experience to audience; however, there are always flaws in their effects.
II. The Amazing Spiderman 2
A. Directed by Marc Webb.Spiderman once again has to stand against the villains to protect his loved ones.
B. Scene: Spiderman fight against Electro at the New York’s Times Square.
C.Techniques:
VFX Team, Sony Pictures Imageworks built a small section of Times Square on stage surrounded by a wall of green screens
A CG Spider-man was then composited into the foreground.
CG Lighting both effects coming out of Electro were next added.
The team use several VFX house including Blur and Pixel Playground.
The final shot is one of 300 that were created Times Square sequence and one of 1,600 in the movie. Image works created about 1,000 shots, MPC handled about 300.
D. Successful or not
1.Unsuccessful:
The lighting doesn’t feel as it travels through space.
Feel flat and no sense of direction
The time the lighting strike object is slower than in reality.
2.Successful:
III. Paranorman
Description: Directed by Chris Butler and Sam Fell. Paranormal is a 3D stop-motion animation. The story is about the boy who can see ghost has to protect his town though many people in his town don’t believe him.
B. Scene: Norman confronts Aggi to release zombies and his town.
C.Techniques:
LAIKA calls it The Foundry’s KATANA in their lighting pipeline
Take advantage of Dragonframe which is an advance software to capture stop motion. It is enhanced with advanced DMX lighting.
2D ink painting and microwaved CD’s.
D. Successful or not
1.Unsuccessful:
2. Successful:
IV. Conclusion
Restate thesis
Summarize points